If there were a direct correlation, CW would not have exposed the I/O buffers as a separate parameter.Īs you observed, increasing the ASIO buffer size increases latency. At least, it isn't necessary to correlate them. There is, I think, no direct relationship between the record and playback I/O buffers and the ASIO/WDM buffers.
I will answer any questions as best I can.
Your thoughts on troubleshooting would be very much appreciated. I'm pretty sure I even matched "4" with the values in "total roundtrip" rather than only In or Out. But, doing so at four different latencies attempted (128, 256, 384, 512) does not remove the drops. So, To me it seems logical to simply match the setting in "4" with everything else. Set 1 back to 128 Increase 4 from 128 to 384 Result: 2 doubles 3 doubles 4 stays the same 5 doubles I next tried to determine what parameters change when you input a value in one of these.Ģ= Buffer size in Audio options -> General tabģ= ASIO Input and Output (and total roundtrip) reported latencies, also general tabĤ= Advanced tab Playback I/O and Record I/Oĥ= Checkbox for "use ASIO reported latency"
Advanced tab: Playback I/O 128 KB and record I/O 128 KB Use ASIO reprted latency (236) is checkedĪs I am trying to learn what the relationship is between each of these settings, I did a few things here and there, only to make the drops worse.
ASIO In and out 5.4 msec and 236 samples, roundtrip 10.7 msec, 472 samples Recording six at once = horrible drops and such with an occasional crashĪ) Sound Card (Project Mix I/O): Sample rate 44100 Hz ASIO/WDM buffer size 128 samples Recording single track sounds ok, minimal popping sounds. Setting buffer size on sound card and SONAR
0 kommentar(er)
